As 2008 winds down and we begin another year, we get to do the whole “new years resolution” thing. One of my resolutions for the upcoming year is to take fewer pictures

[wait, what?]

Yup, that’s right – *fewer* pictures. I’ll explain – Digital cameras make us lazy. When I pick up my camera, I have (for all practical purposes) an unlimited number of shots available to me. It becomes far to easy to simply point the camera at something vaguely interesting and “spray-and-pray” hoping an image turns out. Now while I don’t think there’s inherently anything *wrong* with doing this, I feel that it definitely makes it easier to adopt a lazy attitude – thinking less about composition, form, nailing the shot, and just relying on sheer number of images to produce the end product.

Consider the following account of Drew Gardner, a photojournalist covering a firefight in Kosovo with a single roll of film. (I guess when getting a second roll means potentially getting shot, you make do with what you have!)

Talk about making every shot count! The point is that back in the days of film we were limited by the amount of film we could carry. How many rolls did you carry around with you on a daily basis? 4 or 5? Maybe 10 if you were going heavy? That’s 360 frames at the most (less if you shot 120/220). Heck, I know photographers now who shoot 360 frames in 10 minutes! Imagine if you knew you were limited to 50 or 100 frames for an entire day of shooting. Would you consider each shot more carefully? Of course you would. And in the end that makes us better photographers. Refining our eye, *really looking* at each composition, considering each subject carefully and critically. These are skills that may be in danger of going extinct as machine-gun-gazillion-frame-per-second SLRs take over. Sure it may be useful for somethings (sports, and well… sports) but when I see photographers on the forums with galleries full of cat and baby pictures arguing how they absolutely cannot use camera X because it is *only* 3fps and they *need* 10fps, I just have to laugh.

Further there seems to be an attitude that if you *aren’t* taking gobs of pictures you are somehow “shortchanging” the client or yourself. My attitude is that if I get “the shot” on the first frame, why am I going to waste 100 more on images that I know will simply sit in a dusty corner of my image library, never seeing the light of day.

Anyway, the point is that my resolution is to make *more* images, but take *fewer* pictures – I want to make sure that every frame that comes out of my camera is deliberate and considered. Each image should be thoughtfully arranged, deliberately composed and have a considered subject.

Why not try it? Go out for a day of shooting with an old memory card only big enough to hold a few images (128/256mb or so). Or even an old 35mm or 120 film camera (holgas or lomos are cheap!) and 1 or two rolls of film. After doing this a few times I gaurantee you will notice yourself composing more carefully and considering each shot – making it count. Much like my old post about why I love prime lenses, the principle is the same – imposing a creative restriction on your photography forces you to adapt to the situation, stretching yourself creatively and improving your skill. And in the end, isn’t that what it’s all about?

Anyway, happy new year to you all from all of us here at Ed Z Studios (meaning, well… me) and wishing you all many great images in the year to come!

Dec 172008

- stayed at an unfinished hotel. Got a gorgeous suite for 1/2 price or (but had to dodge construction!)

- eric wrangled a local fisherman into taking us on a boat tour around playa hermosa

- saw stingrays jumping over the bow I our boat (had no idea that rays could jump like that)

- saw a group of sea turtles frolicking in the water close enough to reach out and touch.

Dec 152008

Costa rica is gorgeous. Wifi on the beach isn’t bad either! (from my iPhone)

Whelp… it’s almost 4am and my cab should be here in a few.  Off to sunny beaches and warm weather :-)

This is a “light and fast” backpacking trip, so carrying a lot of gear was out of the question.  Meaning it will just be me and my G9 and a bunch of memory cards.  I even decided against bringing a strobe <gasp!>

we’ll see how it goes, I have quite a bit of faith in the G9…

So I’ve been a fan of JPG magazine since it started, but never really submitted anything to it.   However, when they announced their upcoming issue’s theme of “fairy tale” I knew I had to submit a shot.  It was a choice between this and “sunshine in the rain” (my homepage image), but in the end I felt this one was more fairy-tale-ish, albeit darker.  Anyway, if y’all like it, go here and vote for it to be published in issue 21!

I love playing with light and shadow in my photos, so when Maureen dropped me a line wanting to shoot, I figured it was the perfect opportunity to play with a technique I had been kicking around.   In short, I set up a background light to the right, close to the backdrop and flagged it to creat a hard line of light/shadow (I was working at f/16 to totally kill the ambient)  Then I put Maureen about 8′ in front of the backdrop and lit her hard from the left, using an apollo 28″ softbox.

The end result was to have the lit side on dark, and the dark side on light.    Kind of Noir-ish, kind of chiaroscuro… not sure what to call it, but I like it :-)

I went to show my portfolio to someone this afternoon, and to my dismay discovered that typing in my web address redirected to some obviously spammy page!!!  After a frantic email to my hosting provider, things seem to be back to normal <whew>  Not sure exactly when or for how long the site was down, but can’t have been more than a few hours since I was on this morning making my other posts.

Anyway, my sincere apologies to anyone who visited during the outage and got redirected to the spamsite!

Just a quick clarificationto my last post on the new RadioPoppers, since it’s already been delivered via RSS :-)

To clarify the P1 credit/trade in program – As Kevin explained to me, if you purchased P1s as of Oct 12, you will get 100% credit on the trade in for the new unit.  Pre Oct 12, you’ll get some (generous) credit but not 100%.  Didn’t want to be spreading any disinformation!

Either way, this is still extrememly generous of the RadioPopper folks- Us “early adoptors” often get burned when gen 2 comes out – paying full price for gen 1 and then again for gen 2…  Just another reason I continue to support these guys!

Some very exciting news over with the RadioPopper folks…

Looks like the new P8s are coming soon, and will be far more than we expected.  Syl over at Pixsylated has a bit of an insiders scoop on the new units!

No more fiber optic?  Fires TTL and manual(studio strobes)?

WANT!

I’ve been a big fan of my P1s, but they definitely have their limitations.  They are, well, a first gen product – almost more of a “proof of concept” :-)   However, judging by the hints going round, these new units are going to be an atom bomb in the world of off-camera lighting.    My speculation (hope) is that they’ve found a way to interface/do ttl communication via RF directly through the shoe (no optical required).  Add a 1/8″ “pocketwizard” style jack for studio strobes and well sign me up because I’ll be ordering one for every light I own.

Even cooler is that they’re offering “trade in” credit for your P1s – As I understand it if you purchased P1s after Oct 12, you will get the full value of your P1 in trade in- having only to pay the price difference for the new unit!   Pre-oct 12, you should still get a credit, but not 100% (thanks for the clarification, Kevin!) Either way it’s a really nice move, especially for us “early adopters” who often get burned when “gen 2″ comes out!

December 12 is supposedly the official announcement – let’s see what happens!