<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another analysis of the micro four thirds standard&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1point0.com/2008/08/12/another-analysis-of-the-micro-four-thirds-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/08/12/another-analysis-of-the-micro-four-thirds-standard/</link>
	<description>photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuHa</title>
		<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/08/12/another-analysis-of-the-micro-four-thirds-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6779</link>
		<dc:creator>JuHa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1point0.com/?p=333#comment-6779</guid>
		<description>The best current contrast-detect AF systems seem to be reasonably good, but certainly problematic in an interchangeable-lens camera with bigger (more massive) optics. 

I would expect that the Olympus/Panasonic engineers would have spotted this problem right away and started to develop a solution. But is the solution ready yet? At some point certainly there will be a solution, if not phase-detection then something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best current contrast-detect AF systems seem to be reasonably good, but certainly problematic in an interchangeable-lens camera with bigger (more massive) optics. </p>
<p>I would expect that the Olympus/Panasonic engineers would have spotted this problem right away and started to develop a solution. But is the solution ready yet? At some point certainly there will be a solution, if not phase-detection then something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lux</title>
		<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/08/12/another-analysis-of-the-micro-four-thirds-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6778</link>
		<dc:creator>Lux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1point0.com/?p=333#comment-6778</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve definitely hit the nail on the head regarding the two most important specs of microFT.  So far all the &#039;serious compacts&#039; have been disappointing in one way or another.  Perhaps oly and pana will come up with the goods and satisfy the growing number of people (from families and females to DSLR enthuiasts and rangefinder nostalgics) who want quality in a small package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve definitely hit the nail on the head regarding the two most important specs of microFT.  So far all the &#8216;serious compacts&#8217; have been disappointing in one way or another.  Perhaps oly and pana will come up with the goods and satisfy the growing number of people (from families and females to DSLR enthuiasts and rangefinder nostalgics) who want quality in a small package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.238 seconds -->
