<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture vs. Lightroom &#8211; round 2 Aperture strikes back!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2</link>
	<description>photography by Ed Zawadzki</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Z</title>
		<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>Arrrrgh... I know... and each time I have more and more photos, so it gets harder and harder to switch :-)

I&#039;m seriously considering just going through lightroom, filtering out my &quot;best&quot; pics (4 or 5 star rated), importing them into aperture and then just using aperture going forward, leaving the old stuff &quot;archived&quot; in lightroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrrrgh&#8230; I know&#8230; and each time I have more and more photos, so it gets harder and harder to switch <img src='http://www.f1point0.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m seriously considering just going through lightroom, filtering out my &#8220;best&#8221; pics (4 or 5 star rated), importing them into aperture and then just using aperture going forward, leaving the old stuff &#8220;archived&#8221; in lightroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1point0.com/2008/03/28/aperture-vs-lightroom-round-2/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>And just as you&#039;ve swapped over Lightroom 2.0 will be released, it must surely be just around the corner (its been over a year since v1), and you will have to switch back again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just as you&#8217;ve swapped over Lightroom 2.0 will be released, it must surely be just around the corner (its been over a year since v1), and you will have to switch back again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

