Comments on: Noise – is it really that bad? (The Canon G9 redux…) http://www.f1point0.com/2007/10/24/noise-is-it-really-that-bad-the-canon-g9-redux/ photographer Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:52:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ed Z http://www.f1point0.com/2007/10/24/noise-is-it-really-that-bad-the-canon-g9-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-522 Ed Z Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:33:54 +0000 http://www.f1point0.com/blog/?p=106#comment-522 Thanks Hector. I'm actually pretty satisfied with the noise performance of the G9. I wasn't expecting DSLR quality, but it seems that shooting raw and PP-ing with Lightroom cleans up the images pretty well. (with NoiseNinja reserved for ISO800 and 1600) Also, mostly I print at 8"x10" (or 8"x12") so I'll have to test the output from ISO400 at 13"x19" or larger to really see. Thanks Hector.

I’m actually pretty satisfied with the noise performance of the G9. I wasn’t expecting DSLR quality, but it seems that shooting raw and PP-ing with Lightroom cleans up the images pretty well. (with NoiseNinja reserved for ISO800 and 1600)

Also, mostly I print at 8″x10″ (or 8″x12″) so I’ll have to test the output from ISO400 at 13″x19″ or larger to really see.

]]> By: Hector Ramos http://www.f1point0.com/2007/10/24/noise-is-it-really-that-bad-the-canon-g9-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-521 Hector Ramos Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:22:08 +0000 http://www.f1point0.com/blog/?p=106#comment-521 You have made an excellent point here. It's about time someone addressed the noise issue for what it really is. Until I read this I was not making any prints with ISO 200 or above. I will give it a try now. Thanks for the insight. You have made an excellent point here. It’s about time someone addressed the noise issue for what it really is. Until I read this I was not making any prints with ISO 200 or above. I will give it a try now. Thanks for the insight.

]]>