will be doing so theme-tweaking and rearranging this weekend, so some links may be broken or things may look weird temporarily. 

everything should be back to normal by monday!

Powered by ScribeFire.

NOTE: part one of this article is HERE (opens in a new window), read it first for a discussion of equipment and available light techniques

PART 2
artificial light:
Artificial light comes in two predominant flavors: strobes (flashes) and continuous (sometimes called “hot lights”)  the main problem with both of these (from a “photographing artwork”) perspective is that they tend to be very directional and rather harsh – leading to the dreaded, detail destroying GLARE!

Basically what we need to do is *modify* the light to make it:
1. soft
2. diffuse
3. give even coverage to the artwork.

Now there are any number of ways to do this.  Photographic lighting is all about modifying light by bouncing, reflecting, diffusing etc… there are reflectors, umbrellas (reflective & shoot through), softboxes, bouncecards for flash… There is a whole world of lighting modifiers for studio lighting, and it is easy to get overwhelmed, so we’re going to keep it simple!
Now, If you already happen to have studio strobes, you probably *already* have various lighting modifiers that can soften the light – softboxes, umbrellas, etc… If you don’t, fear not!  You don’t have to spend hundreds (thousands?) of dollars on professional lights to photograph your paintings.

The cheapest (and arguably easiest) way to diffuse and soften your light is to bounce it off something.   The reflected light, will be *much* softer than the harsh direct light.  Even better, you don’t need a lot of fancy equipment to do it.  (note that for the following techniques, strobes with brollys or softboxes will work just as well)

For the DIY-er, you will need:

- 2 photoflood lightbulbs, available at any photo store – these are balanced to 3200k, so you know what color temp. your light is.  (there are also daylight balanced bulbs, they work just as well, just remember to set your white balance!)
- 2 fixtures with reflector dishes, available at a hardware store (you know, the ones with the spring clamp on the back, with the big silver reflector dish?)
- 1 or 2 large pieces of white foamcore (generally comes in 32″x40″ sheets, a good size)

First thing is to set up the artwork.  I like to hang it against a background of black velvet, as the velvet will cut down even more on extraneous reflections.  I got a huge piece of black velvet fabric from a fabric store for <$20.  once the artwork is hung and straight (use a level)  set up the lights.

You want to position the lights on either side of the piece, at around a 45 degree angle, both equidistant from the artwork.   The trick is to position your lights pointing *away* from the artwork, and use the foamcore to reflect the light back to it, creating a much softer, diffuse light.   I like to use a plain old straight-backed dining chair.  Prop the foamcore against the back of the chair (where your back would go if you were sitting in it) and clip the light to the front, pointing at the foamcore.  The light will reflect and give even coverage to the artwork.  Move around the position and angle of the setup until you get proper coverage.

Another thing to keep in mind, although it may seem counter-intuitive, is that the *closer* the light source is to the subject, the larger the “apparent size” of the light souce will be, giving softer light. (Check out Strobist’s explanation of “apparent size” here:
http://strobist.blogspot.com/2007/07/lighting-102-unit-21-apparent-light.html

in other words, put the light sources closer rather than farther to get more even coverage!

Finally, use a polarizing filter on your camera lens.  This will cut down any remaining glare from the piece and give you a perfectly lit photo with no specular highlights.  (to use a polarizing filter, attach it to the lens, and while looking through the camera, rotate the filter -  when you see the glare go away, stop rotating :-)

with your setup in place, and your lighting ready, snap away and enjoy the fantastic results! (don’t forget that this technique applies equally to strobes, so if you’ve got a couple of speedlights or studio flashes they work just as well (if not better))

Is it true? the DA* lenses are finally here?
This comes from Ned Bunnell, the marketing VP for Pentax USA so I’m assuming it’s reliable…<grin>

NED BUNNELL: SDM Lenses Shipping

of course there is no further information. Is this a worldwide release, or just certain countries? are the actually in the stores, or is this just Pentaxes announcement that they are shipping from the factories….

come on man, details!

The announcement of the k100d SUPER has sparked a flurry of speculation on the release of upcoming Pentax cameras, seemingly corroborated by a well known fashion photographer sponsored by Pentax France (Benjamin Karanek) who reported that Pentax would be releasing 2 new DSLRs (not counting the medium format 645d) this year.  Furthermore, these would *not* merely be rebrandings of the k10d or k100d. 

Now for all us Pentaxians, this is thrilling news.  Even if you are perfectly satisfied with the k10/100 (I am), it’s nice to see an aggressive approach by pentax, hopefully gaining some market share, and expanding it’s line of dslrs.  Pentax is often maligned as not having a true “pro” camera, the likes of the Canon 1d series or the nikon d2x, so it would lend them a lot of credence as a “serious” camera maker (as they were back in the old days!)

Most likely fueled by the rumors of an upcoming 18 megapixel sony sensor that will be used in the next pro Nikon body, there is much speculation that pentax will be releasing a full frame (or 1.1 crop to allow for in body SR) camera. 

Personally I think this is *highly* UNLIKELY.   Look at the evidence – all of Pentax’s recent lenses have been aps-c only.  The new DA* lenses are also aps-c only.  Now call me crazy, but I don’t think it likely that a company would revamp their entire PRO lens lineup (the * lenses are Pentax’s pro-grade, the equivalent of canon L-lenses) to aps-c size, and then release a pro camera that would not work with them. 

Now some people will counter that a few of the DA lenses have been tested on full frame, and actually cover the entire frame.  That is true, but the fact remains that is not how they were designed.  Edge performance is poor, and many vignette heavily.  Not exactly what you would want in a pro grade lens.

Not to mention the fact that if the 645d ever materializes, (and the lenses for it are on the roadmap!), IT would be the “full frame” offering, especially if they could market it at a price point to compete with the canon full frame pro model (1dsMKII right now) meaning, around 8k.   Given the fact that Mamiya has just released a MF setup for under 10k, and knowing Pentax’s penchant for aggressive pricing, I think 8k or even less may be possible.  I think the 645d would essentially make a full frame pro dslr offering kind of redundant, and “muddy” the line (especially with no upcoming lenses for it).

So, assuming an aps-s sensor, what would a camera above the k10d look like?  Here’s my take:

  • most likely a 12-14mpix sensor, maker unknown. 
  • weather sealing (obviously), in body AS
  • improved af system (more x-point sensors etc… possibly an “open loop” focusing system like canon to improve speed)
  • more metering segments.
  • FASTER FLASH SYNC.  this is one weakness I see in the k10d.  1/180 is not all that great.  Very often creative use of flash requires a higher sync speed, especially off-camera flash. Most “pro” cameras have 1/250 or 1/500 at least
  • likely a built in grip ala’ the canon/nikon pro bodies.
  • faster frame rate (maybe 8fps?, possibly only 5)

Honestly I think this is probably about it.  It’s not particularly glamorous, but I think the above improvements are really what will appeal to the “pro” market above the k10d.   Image quality is fine.  I think that if you even took the existing k10d sensor and put in in a body like the above it would be a great pro camera.  (And for all you measurebators complaining about the .jpg softness – FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, GO OUT AND TAKE SOME PICTURES INSTEAD OF COMPLAINING. – btw, do you remember when the Nikon d200 came out?  yeah, same “.jpg softness” issue. That’s right – from one of the most highly regarded semi-pro cameras out there. Same “issue”,  and yet plenty of pros are taking fabulous pictures with it.  So there.)

Anyway, I don’t have any connections to Pentax, I don’t have a friend of a friend of a cousin who works there or anything, so all this is pure speculation. ]I think it is logical, well reasoned speculation- but we’ll see in the end!

Powered by ScribeFire.

As a follow-up to my article on how to photograph lightning here are instructions on building a lighting activated camera trigger, to make it even easier!

I don’t have the electrical engineering experience to even attempt something like this- but if anyone does, I’d love to know how it performs.  Seems pretty cool.

http://www.solorb.com/elect/lightning/index.html

Powered by ScribeFire.

Every visual artist faces a similar problem at one point or another. While they may not necessarily be a photographer, photographs are a necessity in the art world. Websites, portfolios, slide, prints – all require high quality, accurate photos of the artist’s paintings/drawings/whatever. Any artist who has just thrown up a painting on the wall and snapped it with a camera knows that getting a good image of a painting *isn’t as easy as it sounds*

but fear not! with a little know-how and a few simple tools, anyone can take a portfolio-worthy photo of their artwork!

note: I started writing this as a single-piece article, but it began getting so long that I decided to split it into 2 installments. Part 1 (this) will deal with, equipment, setup and using natural light. Part 2 will deal with studio or artificial light.

First off,
EQUIPMENT:

While photographing artwork does not require a huge amount of gear, there are a few things that are necessities if you want the best results.

- a camera (obviously!) a dslr will give you more flexibility, especially in terms of lens selection, but a point-and-shoot is usable in a pinch
- a tripod. Photographing artwork is all about maximum detail, and camera shake will destroy any fine detail. a tripod will hold the camera steady, to avoid camera shake
- polarizing filter – especially when using artificial light, a polarizer will cut down on glare and reflections from the pice – the bane of photographing artwork!
- a cable release (optional) like the tripod, this will help cut down on camera shake. if your camer does “mirror lock up” when using the 2s timer, that is an acceptable substitute (check your camera manual for “mirror lock up”)
- optional – a tripod bubble level. This will help “square up” your image. it’s not necessary, especially with the vast amount of correction tools available in photoshop etc… but it will help avoid perspective skew when photographing what is essentially a flat plane.

For the rest of the article, I will assume you are using a dslr, but the techniques are equally applicable to a P&S.

lens selection:
Selecting a lens for photographing artwork is not as straightforward as for some other applications (eg. sports = fast telepohto, street=wide angle to normal etc…) what focal length is appropriate – do you use a telepohoto and back up from the piece? do you use a wide angle and get close in?

before even deciding on focal length, let us consider the 2 main criteria (in my opinion) to look for in an “art” lens:
1. sharp throughout the frame
2. low distortion

we need a sharp lens, because no one wants their painting to look blurry on the edges, and we need low distortion since we don’t want to warp the perspective of the artwork.

To me both of those criteria point to a singly type of lens: the macro lens. Macro lenses are *known* for their sharpness and low distortion, perfect for photographing art (who said macro lenses are only useful for super-close-ups!) Now when it comes to focal length, a lot depends on the size of the art, but the standard 50mm macro (which becomes appx 75mm on a cropped slr sensor) works for most applications. I have used a 50mm macro for everything from a 2″x3″ miniature all the way up to a 6′x6′ monster piece. Just back up as needed :-)

now if you don’t have a dedicated macro lens, and don’t want to spend the money on one, just pick your lens with the lowest distortion and field curvature (probably a standard zoom in the middle of it’s range or prime, and stop it down until the edges are sharp throughout. If you are using a P&S, set the zoom to wherever the image is the sharpest (probably somewhere in the middle of the range) and stop the aperture down to a mid-aperture (something like f/5.6 or f/8. “Stopping down” a lens usually increases it’s performance, as few lenses are at their best at max aperture.)

Now that we’ve got our camera and gear, lets get set up!

The primary concern when photographing artwork is to eliminate/minimize glare. 2d artworks, especially paintings are essentially flat, reflective surfaces (moreso if varnished!) When light hits them they tend to just reflect it back, causing ugly “hot spots” and blown out areas in the photo. NOT conducive to good reproductions!

To avoid glare, we need “soft” light – something diffuse and indirect that will not create “hotspots” (or “specular highlights” if you want to get technical!) There are many approaches to this, and vary depending on whether you are using natural or artificial light. Both methods (natural and artificial) have pros and cons, lets examine them separately.

natural light:
The good thing about natural light is that it requires no special equipment or tools. It’s cheap and easily available. It also requires very little modification to make it nice and soft. The downside, of course is that it is not always available, and it can change rapidly – altering your exposure. Still, in terms of bang for your buck it’s hard to beat!

Now in terms of natural light, the softest light you can get (more or less) is from a northern exposure, preferably on a bright but overcast day. I *love* this light, it actually makes photographing paintings quite easy since it is so soft and even. Other artists have had good luck using natural light outside, in the shade (to avoid direct sunlight), but since I live in an apartment with a northern exposure and big windows, that’s usually the way I go!

I have also found the easiest (and most effective) way to photography small-to mid size pieces using natural light is to lay them flat on the ground, with the camera pointing straight down from above (obviously this won’t work for really big pieces, since you can’t practically get the camera high enough to get the whole thing in frame :-) This is good for 2 reasons 1) it provides an even more diffuse light and 2)it makes sure the piece is “flat” to the camera.

set up the camera on the tripod, use the level to make sure it is straight vertical and you are ready to go. Usually aperture priority works the best – set a medium aperture for optimal lens sharpness and to ensure the whole piece is in focus. zoom to fill the frame as much as possible with the artwork (without cutting off the edges, you can crop in PP) I usually use manual focus, as autofocus often has trouble locking on to a flat artwork. Set your cable release and timer, and you are good to go!

but wait! there is one more consideration before you begin snapping away – Assuming you are photographing something other than monochrome charcoal drawings, color balance is an issue. We need to make sure the white balance on the camera is set correctly, else there will be ugly color casts on the final product. Now you may rely on the camera’s auto setting for “daylight” or “shade” but for best results, it is good to set the white balance manually. There are 2 ways to do this:

1. if you camera has a “custom white balance” setting, turn it on. Put an 18% grey card (or a plain white piece of paper) in place of your artwork and photograph it using the same setup and lighting that you will use for the final piece. This will give the camera a “reference” point to base WB on for the rest of the shoot. Note: if you are using rapidly changing natural light, you may need to do this more than once, and option 2 might be better:

2. if you are shooting raw (and/or your camera does not have an custom-wb feature) simply include the edge of a greycard or pice of paper in the actual frame when you photograph the artwork (it is unlikely that the piece will fill up the entire frame of the camera). that way you can use your post-processors white balance feature to select the grey/white area of the picture and base white balance off that.

So now we’re set up, got our artwork flat and framed, got our natural diffuse light, set our white balance, focus, zoom. now grab your cable release and click away! Presto – professional quality slide results in your own home :-)

Personally I like natural light, and If I’m not in a rush to get my work repro’ed, I’ll save up a bunch of pieces waiting for a good day and photograph them all together. However, sometimes using natural light is just not an option (slide deadline, or at night or whatever), in which case we must resort to using artifical light which will be covered in part 2 of this article.

Click here for part 2 – using artificial light!

CLICK HERE to subscribe to the RSS feed to get the next installment as soon as it is published!

Jul 182007

another shot from Bermuda. The town of St. John, a very picturesque (though kind of touristy) town. this old bike was leaning up against the wall, I think to advertise the shop that rented mopeds to tourists!

Click for larger image on Flickr!

Jul 162007

going to be making some changes to the layout and look and feel of the site in the next few days, so if things are “broken” just bear with me!  will be back to normal soon!

Powered by ScribeFire.

“Resolution” or “DPI” (dots per inch) is a concept in digital photography that is very often misunderstood, even by experienced photographers.

In this article, Aaron Bieber, of Single Serving Photo does a *great* job of breaking down the myths and misunderstandings of digital image resolution. A great read!

Single Serving Photo – Resolution is a myth

Jul 102007

It seems that now-a-days, one can’t visit a
photo sharing site without seeing wall-to-wall “HDR” images.  Everyone
and his brother has written a “how to do HDR” tutorial.  What is
interesting is the visceral reaction this technique evokes.  People
either think it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread or a godawful
technique that mangles images and degrades the “art” of photography.

(The photographic equivalent of black velvet Elvis posters, only without the kitsch appeal?)

Now
I partly understand the animosity to HDR, or at least where it comes
from.  Because it’s easy to do, and produces dramatic results (note I
did not say GOOD results), I feel it is often used as a crutch to try
and make a mediocre image more interesting.  Boring landscape?  run it
through an HDR program and “oooh and ahhh” at the supersaturated colors
and compressed range (not to mention the halos, glow, and probable loss
of sharpness).

HOWEVER:
I’ve also seen some incredibly beautiful images that incorporated HDR techniques

Bottom line, the way I see it is:

HDR is a post-processing
technique, just like b/w conversion or curve adjustments or split
toning.  If used judiciously and in moderation it can be very effective
and give added depth and impact to your photos.  If misused/overused it
simply becomes a generic “fotoshop filter” technique that mangles
images beyond recognition (mostly images that weren’t all that good to
begin with) moreso, it is often used as a crutch to mask sloppy
exposure/metering technique. 

The most effective uses of HDR that I have seen are subtle.  Used
as a tool to retain highlight/shadow detail in high-contrast scenes it
can be very effective (i.e. take 2 images, one metered for highlights and
one metered for shadows and combine with HDR processing when there is
simply too much dynamic range in a scene to capture in one exposure). 
Most of the time though, it is hard to tell that this is even “HDR”
since it often lacks the supersaturated “punch” of the 5,6 or even 9
image composites.  The danger comes with the “more is better mentality”
- same thing happens with image sharpening in Photoshop i.e. if 20 sharpening is good, 40 must be twice as good. 

so to all the aspiring HDR-ists out there remember: use a light hand
applying the technique, your images will thank you, and dont forget, it’s only
one technique out of many!

Powered by ScribeFire.

From Rob Galbraith

This guy (David Honl) makes and sells several useful light-modifiers for speedlights (snoots/gobos/barndoors) (LINK)

this is great for folks doing “strobist style” off camera lighting using speedlights… and the prices aren’t bad!

the strap that the attachments hold on to is also great for attaching gels to the flash – just stick 2 pieces of Velcro onto the gel (cut to fit) and bam…

Definitely worth looking at for someone looking to build a portable/light “lighting on location” kit.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Got a couple of decent shots. Next year (if still in Philly!) I am thinking of setting up along kelly drive, across the river from the waterworks, and trying to catch the fireworks reflections in the water, with the waterworks in the background.

2007-07-04at22-23-40-PENTAX K100D.jpg

2007-07-04at22-33-44-PENTAX K100D.jpg

2007-07-04at22-32-50-PENTAX K100D.jpg

2007-07-04at22-34-58-PENTAX K100D.jpg

Powered by ScribeFire.